Erickson Tribune

Travel

UPDATED: Monday, July 16, 2007

National parks due for makeover

Posted on Sunday, July 15, 2007
 

By Bill Herrfeldt
THE ERICKSON TRIBUNE

The country’s national parks have always offered a wondrous respite from day-today city life, and the National Park Service (NPS) has been responsible for keeping them that way.

Unfortunately, after many years of inflation, scanty funding, and unrelenting deterioration, these treasures are becoming less attractive as the years pass.

History of declining attendance
There are 391 properties in all—national parks, monuments, battlefields, historic sites and recreation areas— each a unique link in a chain that crosses the nation. But many of these gems are losing their luster. After decades of neglect, facilities have deteriorated, programming has suffered, and staffing levels have fallen, along with attendance.

After peaking at more than 287 million in 1999, attendance has dropped in six of the past seven years, settling below 273 million in 2006, according to the NPS.

Centennial celebration sparks interest, major money
However, things are about to change, if the government has anything to say about it. In preparation of the centennial celebration in 2016, the White House has proposed to increase funding for national parks by $258 million in the 2008 budget, the first step in a plan to spend as much as $3 billion in public and private money on these popular attractions over the coming decade. Its proposal targets one of the few domestic areas where funding significant new initiatives is called for in fiscal 2008 spending.

The proposal, which must be approved by Congress, would also call on private donors and philanthropies to donate as much as an additional $1 billion, with the federal government matching the donated funds.

“The House approved $200 million of the increase, and our request now goes to the Senate. Things are looking pretty good,” says Kathy Kupper, spokeswoman for the NPS.


national_park_attendance.jpg

Travel
Image
More Travel

Rome: Glimpse of eternity in a mere 2 days

Pittsburgh's market area tickles visitors' senses

You-pick farm in New Mexico: Chilis, not apples

Titanic treasures to go on display at Ga. aquarium

Read or Add a Comment?

Maritime museums

Youth vs. experience in the sky

Barging into Ireland!

Taming the traffic beast

Voluntourism vacations

X-ray body scanners at airports

Tools

Write a Comment on Story

Print

Email Story

Add to Favorites

Entrance fees to rise at some parks
In addition, based on the recommendation of consultants hired by the NPS, about one-third of the national parks will announce increases in fees for annual passes and automobile admission over the next three years. The NPS, which has planned the increases for some time, did not publicize them from its headquarters in Washington, leaving that job to site managers.

“The intention is to let affected communities absorb the news and see if they would go along with the increases,” says David Barna, chief of communications for the agency, in a Washington Post article. Park superintendents can recommend that the increases be rescinded if enough people protest.

“The fee increases are in line with a consultant’s recommendation that the parks charge fees according to four categories of annual passes based on park size, amount of services offered, and other factors,” Barna says.

In light of these increases, many people share the concern that their entrance fees go to the federal government and are not used by the parks for improvements. “Before 1996, this money did go into the treasury, but the fees now stay in the national parks,” Kupper says. “Since 1998, an estimated $1.34 billion in entrance fees have funded about 11,700 projects in our parks, everything from buildings to basic infrastructure. All of that money is now used to improve the visitor’s experience.”

National parks still a bargain
But for a family visiting many of the parks, entrance fees are a small part of what they will have to pay. They will also spend money for accommodations, food, and other necessities. The NPS makes sure that these costs remain in line. “There are specific guidelines so these costs are competitive with those in the area where the park is located, so visitors will pay the same as they would anywhere near the park” Kupper says.

“Finally, keep in mind that older adults can obtain an America the Beautiful Interagency Senior Pass for a onetime fee of $10. Then they get into all 391 national parks without additional fees for the rest of their lives. In other words, increasing fees do not affect seniors,” Barna says. Furthermore, all those accompanying someone with a Senior Pass will be able to enter the parks without paying a fee.

“We really want to connect with everybody because our national parks represent the best of America. They are almost a microcosm of our country, with their culture and history, and they are right there in most people’s backyards. And even with the proposed fee increases, our national parks are still a bargain,” Kupper says.



vacation.jpg

Click Here to Order Now!