Erickson Tribune

Top Stories

UPDATED: Monday, November 19, 2007

What’s wrong with Social Security?

Posted on Monday, October 29, 2007
 

By Bill Herrfeldt and Michael G. Williams
THE ERICKSON TRIBUNE

Just like a leak in the roof, Social Security’s dilemma may develop slowly, but its full impact on retirees is inevitable. The problems facing Social Security are easy to explain. Following World War II, the birthrate in the U.S. exploded and created the so-called baby boom generation.

Not only are baby boomers now reaching retirement age, they are enjoying increased life expectancy while the country is experiencing a reduction in new births.

All those factors considered, America’s future retirees face unprecedented turbulence in the Social Security system.

Less money for Social Security
The demographics paint a grim portrait. Millions of baby boomers will hit retirement in 2008, when people born in 1946 reach Social Security’s early retirement age of 62. From then until 2025, another large crop of baby boomers will reach 62 years of age each year.

A retiree’s Social Security benefits are paid from the taxes of those who are still working, and the government uses what remains for general purposes, replacing them with government-backed IOUs.

So the program’s finances are based on the relationship between the number of workers paying taxes and the number of retirees receiving benefits. And according to recent U.S. Census figures, baby boomers have not produced enough children to replace themselves, shrinking the number of taxpaying workers.

Why is this important? Back in 1950, as the baby boom was just gaining momentum, each retiree’s benefit was shouldered by about 16 workers, so taxes were low. Today, that number has dropped to 3.3 workers per retiree. By 2025, it will reach about two workers per retiree. In other words, each retiree will look to only two current workers for his or her retirement benefits.


wrong_socialsecurity.jpg

Top Stories
Image
More Top Stories

Does age matter?*

'We have the ability to make things better'

People make the place

Rudeness rising

Read or Add a Comment?

Car repair

Uninsured Motorist

Lyme Disease Story

Immigration

Creativity and the Brain!

How to Succeed in a Global Economy

Tools

Write a Comment on Story

Print

Email Story

Add to Favorites

When taxes don’t cover benefits
 
“Starting in the year 2017,when they don’t have enough tax income to pay the benefits, the government is going to have to go to private capital markets and borrow money to pay back the trust fund,” explains Dr. Joseph Gribbin, a professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County’s Erickson School, and an associate commissioner for the Social Security Administration.

“They won’t be able to borrow from Social Security like they have been, which has kept interest rates down. That’s going to spike interest rates because there won’t be any more annual surplus.”

According to Gribbin, that’s a “double whammy.” As a result, interest rates and housing interest rates will  spike, forcing the economy into a downward spiral and, subsequently, lower levels of economic activity.

As Gribbin explains it, the reason there are excess funds after Social Security benefits are paid is that, when the country was about five months away from going broke in 1983, the government decided to build up a surplus through a trust fund. The surplus has been building ever since and, today, sings to the tune of about $2.1 trillion.

In ten years, this $2.1 trillion will grow to $2.6 trillion, but there will also be fewer Social Security taxes collected than the benefits owed. This means the feds will have to look to the trust fund to make up the difference.

Further taxes likely
But Gribbin raises yet another concern. Where are they going to get the money to pay back the trust fund? The answer:

“They’re going to tax the American people again at a time when the debt is zooming,” predicts Gribbin. “So, when they say it’s going to be exhausted in 2041, that’s not the big problem. The big problem comes within the next ten years, when all of a sudden the government will not have a surplus from Social Security to borrow.”

It’s very likely that current and soon-to-be retirees will receive everything that is coming to them from Social Security, even if it requires the federal government to begin restoring the trust fund. Of greater concern is the continuation of those payments to people who will retire in 2030 and beyond.

Many alternatives to our country’s long-term Social Security problems remain at the center of national debate. Next month, The Erickson Tribune will explore those alternatives and ask for your opinion about the next steps we should take.



Click Here to Order Now!