|
Say you owned the corner
store and needed to hire one employee. Say further that there was a federal law
providing that if you hired an American citizen for that position, you would be
subject to a fine equal to 35% of your income. If you said, "OK, if that's
the law then I will hire a non-citizen", would you therefore be evil? Or
would you be entirely justified in saying "If society wants me to hire an
American, then they should change that law and not fine me for doing it"?
The U.S. government does impose such a law, and multinational
corporations face the shopkeeper's dilemma every day. That law should be
changed.
I am one of the people who
decides to locate jobs outside of the U.S. Specifically,
I am the head of tax for a U.S. multinational. It is my job to advise that high value
manufacturing and research should, from a tax point of view, be located outside
of this country. I advise that it is better to invest cash in foreign
operations than in American ones. If the recent tax proposal of House Ways and
Means Committee Chairman Rangel becomes law, I will advise that good
administrative jobs should be moved out of the U.S. I don’t like giving that advice, but under current
law that’s what the numbers dictate. I want to change that.
Of course tax isn’t the only
thing that governs the decision on where to put operations. My company has a
set of activities that we can afford to keep in the U.S. out of loyalty, but if we did too much of that we’d
be acquired by another (probably foreign) company. For the rest of the
operations, it’s just math - add up relative labor and transportation costs and
the cost of materials, figure in tax, and that tells you where to locate,
excluding places with homicidal or corrupt governments. For the highest tech,
highest profit operations, though - the ones that involve the best jobs - tax
becomes dominant.
U.S. law currently provides that most income earned abroad
is only taxed by the U.S. when you bring the cash home. So, if you make $100 in
America you only keep $65 after the U.S. 35% corporate tax, but you keep the full $100 if you
earn it in the Dominican Republic. When you reinvest that $100 of D.R. cash you can use
the full $100 if you invest abroad, but only $65 if you invest in America, due to the U.S. tax bite. So
you invest in new foreign operations, not American ones.
Changing the law to tax the
D.R. operations currently would not work. America is not the only economy that counts any more, and
most countries do not tax foreign earnings at all. If the U.S. immediately taxed foreign earnings, our companies
would get acquired or crushed by competitors, and we’d just lose our
headquarters jobs. Like it or not, it is a global economy now, and this country
does not control it.
But there is a simple
solution that works. Give corporations a deduction for dividends they pay, and
make up the tax revenue by getting rid of special rates for capital gains and
by imposing a 7½% tax on individual income over $500,000 a year, which is all
it takes to be revenue neutral. That would make the U.S. the best location in the world for high value
operations. It would restore our economy and give middle class workers market
power.
There are plenty of proposals
circulating for mostly hokey ways to stimulate our weak economy. The American
people need to demand a real, long term solution. Change the rules so that I
can tell my employer to put all the best jobs here.
Matt Lykken is a tax attorney and is Director of
SharedEconomicGrowth.org. Details of the
proposal can be found at www.sharedeconomicgrowth.org
. |